paulw Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 File Name: Baltimore Memorial Classic File Submitter: paulw File Submitted: 03 Dec 2009 File Updated: 03 Dec 2009 File Category: Stadiums Version: 1.0 Baltimore Memorial Stadium Classic By PaulW and SeanO There are 2 versions included: the 1956-1961 version (orioday_5661.big) and the 1964-1969 version (orioday_6469). The only substantive difference is the scoreboards. To use the stadium rename the one you wish to use orioday.big and copy this file into your ...MVP/Data/Stadium folder. Also copy the file orioday.txt into your ...MVP/Data folder. This will fix the dugouts and change the cameras slightly. These stadiums were designed specifically for the MVP season mods ('56,'61,'64, '67). I do not know the name of the file for Baltimore Memorial in Total Classics 10 and don't want to encourage anyone to overwrite the nice version of Memorial with Total Classics. Someone put a lot of work into that version. Create a post on mods if you'd like to use one of my versions in Total Classics 10. I'm sure someone will let you know how. Thanks to SeanO as always for his initial "grunt work" in creating the original Baltimore Memorial. Also, thanks to my friend Hyman who created the initial light towers which I used to create the light towers in this version. Contact Info: paulwangerin@yahoo.com Click here to download this file Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee4Life Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 Thank you very much Paul and Sean! I just wish I can give you guys more than five stars for the rating of this mod! Very much appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee4Life Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 Paul, one minor mistake in the 1956-1961 version of Memorial Stadium. There's a word misspelled on the scoreboard. I have it highlighted here so you can see. Again, it's minor and it can happen to anyone. Although I do have one other question. I'm looking at the scoreboard on both versions and it says that Baltimore beat New York 5-4. But in every inning it has the Orioles scoring no runs. But the other version, 1964-1969 is perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim825 Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 Knowing Paul, the misspelling and the scoreboard might have been intentional. I remember him saying that he likes to add something small to his mods that usually only he notices that identifies them as his own. In this case, it is either that, or he made a few mistakes. I can't wait to check out these stadiums! :good: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean O Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 Knowing Paul, the misspelling and the scoreboard might have been intentional. I remember him saying that he likes to add something small to his mods that usually only he notices that identifies them as his own. In this case, it is either that, or he made a few mistakes. I can't wait to check out these stadiums! Jim is right, the misspelling is intentional, just like the scoreboard on paul's original Shibe Park. Thanks for continuing the work Paul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee4Life Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 Jim is right, the misspelling is intentional, just like the scoreboard on paul's original Shibe Park. Why would he want to intentionally misspell a word? It is not like anyone is going to be dumb enough to take one of his stadium mods and try to pass it off as work they did. You can always tell a Paulw ballpark. It makes you want to stop and look at it in the game to really take it all in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulw Posted December 3, 2009 Author Share Posted December 3, 2009 Paul, one minor mistake in the 1956-1961 version of Memorial Stadium. There's a word misspelled on the scoreboard. I have it highlighted here so you can see. Again, it's minor and it can happen to anyone. Although I do have one other question. I'm looking at the scoreboard on both versions and it says that Baltimore beat New York 5-4. But in every inning it has the Orioles scoring no runs. But the other version, 1964-1969 is perfect. Well, I'm 1 for 2 on this one. The all zero's for Baltimore on the scoreboard is done on purpose. It's just a quirky thing I like to do. The mispelling of sponsors (sponors, wtf?) is a boner on my part. Sorry, I'll patch this up. Is the stadium generally working for everyone who has tried it? No crashes or any bizarre occurences with balls rolling under walls or anything? I absolute hate working on wall.dat simply because it's so hard to test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee4Life Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 Well, I'm 1 for 2 on this one. The all zero's for Baltimore on the scoreboard is done on purpose. It's just a quirky thing I like to do. The mispelling of sponsors (sponors, wtf?) is a boner on my part. Sorry, I'll patch this up. Is the stadium generally working for everyone who has tried it? No crashes or any bizarre occurences with balls rolling under walls or anything? I absolute hate working on wall.dat simply because it's so hard to test. You don't have to patch it up on my account Paul. These guys had me convinced it was intentional. I just wanted them to know that no one can take your work and pretend to pass it off as their own and get away with it. Your stuff is that good. Thank you for everything that you have ever done. Oh, and so far after playing one game in this ballpark (I used the 1956 version) there were no problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FredGherkin Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 Great job. This ballpark is finally playable without the heads popping out of the dirt. I've seen no issues with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Padres67 Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 Great work as always. I hit a few pitches around and didn't see anything unusual. Thanks also for making it possible to eliminate the fans. my game plays better with the stands empty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim825 Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 Paul - I'll echo the comments that have already been made -- Great job! I added the stadium to TC56 and played around with it and it looks and plays really nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dannyt Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 Awesome work. It's always awesome to see people still working on this game. I hope it keeps going because we still don't have a better PC baseball game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emath2432 Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 One word: Amazing. Two more words: Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulw Posted December 4, 2009 Author Share Posted December 4, 2009 Thank you to everyone for your nice comments. Modding ballparks is fun for me but it is also a lot of work. I *try* to throw a little artistic flavor into them so sometimes a few things are not completely accurate. I've got a very nice night version I'm working on now. I'll probably release it on Saturday. If I could have a wish: I'd love to take MVP Baseball as it is and redo the player animations and the crowds. I'd maybe make one or two adjustments to the statistical model. What a great game that would be. It would also absolutely have to be compatible with what's there now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeRudi26 Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 Awesome work. It's always awesome to see people still working on this game. I hope it keeps going because we still don't have a better PC baseball game. Ditto. Great stuff as always, paul. Thanks for the hard work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.