Jump to content

TEAMS FOR TOTAL CLASSIC PHASE 3


pierre

Recommended Posts

Here's the 28 teams we've got so far We still need a few more to get to a total of 30.

50 phils

62 giants

64 cards

64 phils

70 reds

71 pirates

74 white sox

75 boston

76 tigers

77 nyy

77 LA

79 pirates

80 braves

83 white sox

83 orioles

84 sd

89 sf

89 cubs

90 a's

91 Pirates

91 twins

93 braves

93 phillies

95 rockies

96 Rangers

97 marlins

98 padres

99 indians

Link to comment
Share on other sites

please fix the 96 yanks

why dont they have bernie,jeter,or o-neal?

Are you sure you have the proper files? Bernie, Jeter and O'Neill are definitely on the '96 Yankees! I know because I created the .met file for the team in MVP2004 Total Classics and Fuzz just imported the file over for Total Classics MVP2005.

I also just opened up the rosters in MVPEdit and verified tha all 3 players on the team. Here's the list of players on the '96 Yankees:

Wade Boggs

David Cone

Mariano Duncan

Andy Fox

Joe Girardi

Dwight Gooden

Derek Jeter

Jimmy Key

Jim Leyritz

Tino Martinez

Ramiro Mendoza

Jeff Nelson

Paul O'Neill

Andy Pettitte

Tim Raines

Mariano Rivera

Kenny Rogers

Reuben Sierra

Darryl Strawberry

John Wetteland

Bernie Williams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here is the final list of teams that will be added to 'TC' phase 3:

50 phils

52 A's

62 giants

64 cards

64 phils

70 reds

71 pirates

74 white sox

75 boston

75 cleveland

76 tigers

77 nyy

77 LA

79 pirates

80 braves

83 white sox

83 orioles

84 sd

89 sf

89 cubs

90 a's

91 Pirates

91 twins

93 braves

93 phillies

95 rockies

96 Rangers

97 marlins

98 padres

99 indians

there can 'always' be why not this team or replace that team...

the goal was to get some more 1970 & later clubs for phase 3 AND give

as much variety to the 120 team total as possible. (resources permitting of course)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Updated team 'Total Classics' P3 team list:

yr / team / running count

05 NY Giants

08 Cubs

09 Detroit

09 Pitttsburgh

10 Phil A's

12 Phil A's

12 NY Giants

18 Red Sox

19 ChiSox

24 Senators

27 NYY

29 A's

29 Cubs

34 St L

34 Crawfords

35 Detroit

41 NYY

41 Red Sox

46 Detroit

46 St L

48 Browns

48 Cleveland

49 Dodgers

50 Phillies

52 A's / 25

53 NYY

54 NY Giants

55 Dodgers

57 Braves

59 ChiSox

60 Pittsburgh

61 Braves

61 Detroit

61 NYY

61 Senators

61 Reds

62 Angels

62 Boston

62 Mets

62 SF

63 ChiSox

64 Cubs

64 Orioles

64 St L

64 Colts

64 KC

64 Phillies

65 Dodgers

65 Twins

65 Indians / 50

66 Astros

67 Boston

68 Detroit

68 St L

69 Braves

69 Cubs

69 Mets

69 Pilots

69 Senators

70 Orioles

70 Reds

70 Twins

71 Pittsburgh

73 Angels

73 Mets

74 A's

74 Rangers

74 ChiSox

75 Indians

75 Red Sox

75 Reds

76 Detroit

77 Dodgers

77 KC / 75

77 Reds

77 NYY

78 Red Sox

78 NYY

78 Dodgers

78 SD

79 Pittsburgh

80 Astros

80 Braves

80 Expos

80 Philadelphia

82 Brewers

83 Orioles

83 ChiSox

84 Detroit

84 SD

84 Mets

85 NYY

86 Mets

86 Angels

86 Boston

87 St L

87 Twins

88 Dodgers

89 Cubs / 100

89 SF

90 A's

90 Reds

91 Blue Jays

91 Twins

91 Pittsburgh

93 Braves

93 Phillies

94 Expos

95 Rockies

96 Rangers

96 NYY

97 Florida

97 Mariners

98 SD

98 NYY

99 Indians

2000 NYY

2000 Mets

2001 Diamondbacks / 120

without re checking this is the list that covers 'all' spots for the 120 Classic Teams

for TC P3

this has been alot of work for alot of people :eew:

though it is not 'perfect' it is coming out quite well & all is pretty much done:

pics, logos, uni's, audios, .met files, etc. etc are now being put together

then some testing

so we are at the 5-7 day point roughly. a wee bit more patience and

it will be good to go :wtg:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand the reasoning behind 1993 braves rather than 1995, 1996, or 1991. I just don't get it. :roll: :shrug: :roll:

Please help me understand what is idea here. Have a good morning. Mo.

It's probably because someone submitted a roster for the '93 Braves rather than the '91, '95, or '96 Braves. If someone had submitted a roster for one of the teams you listed instead, it would have been included.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes, it could have been one of the other years

(there is always another or different year when talking about

'which' teams to include)

Atlanta Braves:

yr / wins

'91 / 94

'93 / 104!

'95 / 90

'96 / 96

....................

the '93 team had one of the great starting staffs in recent baseball history

(Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz & Avery. all with 220+ ip and at least 15 wins each!

no Maddux for '91 team)

the '93 roster does have C.Jones & R.Klesko on the roster also. So, it is very

'close' to the '95 & '96 roster

of course there is always another or different year when talking about

'which' team(s) to include

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have one. Why the 1999 Cleveland Indians, and not the 1995 drought ending Indians?

A friend of mine, the guy that modded my XBox was interested in these mods. When he asked me if the 95 Indians were on there, I had to tell him no. He lost interest at that point.

It very well could have been either team.

In 1995, Cleveland led the AL in both batting and pitching. They finished with 30 game lead over 2nd place KC and did make it to the World Series.

In 1999, Cleveland again led the AL in batting (scoring 1009 runs!) and they finished 21.5 games ahead of 2nd place Chicago.

The core of the team (Thome, Vizquel, Lofton, Ramirez) was together for both teams.

Ultimately for Total Classics Phase 3, it probably came down to someone submitting a roster for the '99 Indians to the Total Classics team. If a '95 Indians roster had been submitted instead, that team would have been in Phase 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...